Skip to end of metadata
Go to start of metadata

You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Page History

« Previous Version 21 Next »

Overview

All changes to the OpenSocial spec are proposed, discussed, and voted on in the spec list.

To look at changes in the previous iterations, please look at:

Spec Process

Adding proposals to the OpenSocial specification may follow many paths, but below is the basic overview.

  1. Come up with a bright idea.
  2. Create a functioning implementation or extension (preferably in Apache Shindig) that embodies the ideas and can be evaluated by other people.
  3. Write up a page in this wiki that describes the proposal and outlines some use cases
  4. Start a discussion thread on the OpenSocial and Gadgets Spec group (link with proposal wiki page).
  5. Iterate on prototype and proposal to include community feedback
  6. Create a new Issue on OpenSocial-Resources project.  (link with proposal wiki page and in discussion thread)
  7. Add a link to the specification-scope document in svn specification-scope in svn.
  8. Modify the spec document(s) to include your proposal.  Surround all changes with <x:draft> tags.
  9. Create a patch file with svn diff and attach to the Issue
  10. Check in the changes to the spec.  Comment must include the issue number and identify proposal - ex: Issue NNN
  11. Designate that revision as the voting revision and link with the Issue.  Make an announcement on the discussion thread and link from the wiki proposal.

For information about the spec process itself, please see the Specification Process. The process for voting on proposals is here documented on the Voting on Proposals page.

Proposed Timeline

In accordance with the OpenSocial development process, this is the timeline that is proposed for OpenSocial 2.0. Because we would like to ensure we have time for the required prototypes to "bake", we will try to plan for current iteration plus one. For this reason, you will see proposals and a plan for OpenSocial 2.0. and "v.Next". Further, Shindig is a crucial part of most of the implementations of OpenSocial. To this end, we believe it makes sense to include and propose a time line for Shindig as well. It is our hope that this will encourage increased involvement in both projects.

The section below details this plan. Emphasis will be placed on iterating over working prototypes as well as the "patches" to the specification. One thing that happened during the creation of the 1.0 version of the specification is that the last phase of this process became much more drawn out. There was still considerable design work happening in what was intended to be a review of the final specification to be published. We are taking the following steps in an attempt to avoid this:

  • Prototyping of proposals should begin as early as possible. No proposal voted on without a prototype in place (ideally in the Shindig sandbox)
  • Draft versions of the specification will be produced on a regular basis. Sections that have been modified will be annotated to indicate, as best as possible, the changes (e.g. include a line with the code fix number in the document)
  • No code changes during final review and publication

Note: OpenSocial "v.Next" dates are tentative.

OpenSocial 2.0 Timeline

Overview: January 6, 2011 - June 9, 2011

  • Jan 6 - Jan 27: Define Scope
  • Jan 28 - May 12: Define proposals
  • May 12th - June 3rd: Voting on proposals and spec patches attached to tracking issue.  In parallel prototypes should be worked on.
  • June 3rd - June 24th: Apply/Back-out patches
  • June 30th: Specification complete and prototypes complete for each proposal

Themes for OpenSocial 2.0

The following areas are our focus for OpenSocial 2.0

  • A Clean Consistent Specification
  • Stronger Interoperability
  • Ease of Implementation for Containers and Clients

A Clean Consistent Specification

Unnecessary complexity makes it difficult to implement gadgets and containers.  The v2 version gives us a chance to break with the past and wipe the slate clean.  This means removing deprecated features and fixing a bunch of small problems that stand in the way of easy implementations.

Stronger Interoperability

OpenSocial has always formed an umbrella over other standards.  Over time the set of useful standards evolves.  In v2 we should align with existing standards where it makes sense and eliminate OpenSocial specific technologies when others will do. Examples of this include ActivityStreams integrate 

Ease of Implementation for Containers and Clients

There are a number things that can make developing gadgets and Opensocial difficult.  Integrating into social and enterprise sites is difficult.  Client and REST API libraries require a large amount of configuration to work with multiple providers.   There are a number of efforts that will improve this situation.  A stable container API will make it much easier to add gadgets and OpenSocial to an existing site.  Consistent enterprise extensions will mean that client/server interoperability will be maintained.

Scope: OpenSocial 2.0

Prototype proposals and vote on their specifications

Once the set of proposals for a given iteration is approved, the proposals need to be prototyped. All the wiki pages will be tagged with Needs Prototype (vX.X). If you are implementing a prototype for a proposal, you should update the proposal's wiki page with information about your prototype and add a Prototype in progress (vX.X) tag to the wiki source. Once your prototype is complete, and any necessary modifications to the spec have been discussed and incorporated into the current draft, the proposal page should be tagged with Has Prototype (vX.X).

Final review and publication

Once all proposals have been implemented and any necessary changes made to the draft specification, the community reviews the draft and conducts a final vote to promote the current draft to an official spec. At that time we'll reset this page to start focusing on the next iteration.

Proposals


Add pages here for proposals that are just starting our or are not yet slated for a version.

Add Resources to Social Data Models


Latest Minutes from Spec Working Meetings are here 

Please vote for latest proposals using the links in the doc above.

Table below is NOT fully up to date yet, so please use the google doc above.

Proposals for 2.0: Current Status At a Glance

  • (grey lightbulb) Proposal under discussion. Not yet included in scope.
  • (lightbulb) Proposal accepted. Patch under development.
  • (star) Patch under discussion
  • (red star) Patch partially submitted, still needs work
  • (warning) Patch got a -1, still under discussion
  • (thumbs up) Patch fully committed to SVN
  • Prototype available

The changes to the spec can be found on the OpenSocial Resources project on google code.

(thumbs up)

Proposal

Owner

Status

Ind. CLA

Corp. CLA

(grey lightbulb)

UserPrefs vs AppData

Mark Weitzel

No one has signed up yet so, for now, I'll throw my name in the hat. From an IBM perspective, we've been looking at a number of use cases around user prefs & app data and would like to help drive this work.

Y

Y

(lightbulb)

Merge-incorporate Activity Streams into OpenSocial

Mark Weitzel / Eric Woods

There is a patch submitted to the SVN for the spec and the code is available in the Shindig sandbox. There are several issues with this work that we are tracking down:

  • The ActivityStrea.ms effort has not released a stable version of their specification
  • We need to ensure there is proper IP coverage and clarity around anything that the AS team produces

Y/Y

Y/Y

(grey lightbulb)

Investigate spec changes to support inline gadgets

Mark Weitzel / Rich Manalang

(live) Inline gadget discussion thread
(deprecated) Inline gadget discussion thread

...(From EOS) This is a general requirement to satisfy the performance requirements found within enterprise settings.

Y

Y

(grey lightbulb)

Add semantic information to relationships

Mark Weitzel / Inbal Ronen (IBM) / Ido Guy (IBM)

...

Y/N/N

Y/?/?

(grey lightbulb)

Align CMIS and OpenSocial

Mark Weitzel / Eric Woods / Matt Tucker / Bill Lynch

...

Y / Y / ? /?

Y / Y / ? /?

(grey lightbulb)

Formalize Javascript Container APIs

Michael Hermanto

Common Container Specification

? /?

? /?

(grey lightbulb)

Add semantic information to relationships

Mark Weitzel / Inbal Ronen (IBM) / Ido Guy (IBM)

...

Y/N/N

Y

(grey lightbulb)

Make JSON-RPC a MUST instead of a MAY

 

 

 

 

(grey lightbulb)

XSD Validation & ATOM Mapping (or RelaxNG)

Mark Weitzel

We need to determine the right extension patterns for the various OpenSocial schema. Also, there was a blog post on OpenSocial's mapping to ATOM that is worth discussing.

Y

Y

(grey lightbulb)

Add additional lifecycle events and/or new management callbacks

Mark Weitzel

This could be the start of a "Management Extension" for OpenSocial

Y

Y

(grey lightbulb)

Add appInvite to OSML.

Mark Weitzel / Chris Cole

This idea came up in the mobile discussion adding mobile views . We already have the script function "requestShareApp" and 
<os:PeopleSelector>. Perhaps a better approach could be to extend 
OSML to have a simple tag-based invite UI. 
<os:AppInvite /> 
Then the container could choose the appropriate implementation, be it 
a link/URL or a rich dialog.

Y

Y

(grey lightbulb)

Improvements to Tabs/Skins

Mark Weitzel

Improvements to Tabs and Skins

Y

Y

(grey lightbulb)

Selection and Action Contribution

Andrew Davis/Matt Hatem

Declarative Actions Contributions and Selection

Y

Y

(grey lightbulb)

OpenSearch

Andrew Davis/Igor Belakovskiy

 

 

Y

(grey lightbulb)

Container Window/Dialogs

Andrew Davis/Chih-hung Chiang

 

 

Y

(lightbulb)

Embedded Experiences

Ryan Baxter

Embedded Experiences

Y

Y

(grey lightbulb)

Remove Quirks mode

Matt Marum

Remove Quirks Mode

 

 

(lightbulb)

Spaces Proposal

Evgeny Bogdanov

Groups Discussion
Vote for inclusion in scope here.
Issue with patches here

 

 

(star)

View Level Feature Proposal

Matt Marum

View Level Features Proposal

 

 

(red star)

Simple Gadget Format Proposal

Chris Cole

Simple Gadget Thread
Issue 1162 for patch
Vote: Revision 1371

Y

Y

(grey lightbulb)

http://docs.opensocial.org/display/OSD/Gadget+Manifest+FileGadget Manifest

Chris Cole

Manifest Proposal
Manifest Thread

Potentially the use cases could be covered by the "View Level Features" proposal, provided the use cases are fleshed out and covered.

This proposal has been abandoned for this spec cycle.  Greater interop is required before this has enough value to justify the work.

Y

Y

(grey lightbulb)

oEmbed Integration

Paul Lindner

Define how gadgets can be referenced in oEmbed.

Y

Y

(grey lightbulb)

oStatus Integration

Paul Lindner

Adding well-known and webfinger support, extend activity streams with magic signatures and salmn

Y

Y

(grey lightbulb)

OAuth 2 Integration

Paul Lindner

Document and specify that the current securityToken scheme is really OAuth2 Bearer Tokens

Y

Y

(grey lightbulb)

Content Type URL signable

Bastian Hofmann

 

 

 

(thumbs up)

Cross Container Data Requests

Chris Cole

Discussion Thread

Issue 1181
VOTE Revision 1418

Defines a mechanism for using data tags to invoke social API calls from a different container and a way to embed multiple credential sets in a gadget for a variety of APIs running on different provider sites.

Y

Y

(thumbs up)

Remove "Non-Tags" section from Social Gadget spec

Chris Cole

The "Non-Tags" section is not necessary since any additions to the spec must be approved through the spec process anyway.  It should be removed to avoid confusion.
Discussion thread
Non-Tags spec section
Issue 1179
Vote: Revision 1411

Y

Y

(thumbs up)

Standardize variable substitution on EL syntax and consolidate EL spec definitions

Chris Cole

Discussion Thread
Older Variable substitution is more limited and redundant to EL syntax.  Spec should standardize on EL syntax and deprecate older variable syntax
Issue 1164
*[VOTE Revision 1371

Y

Y

Working Session - RTP

  • No labels